πŸƒ Suunto Race S vs Suunto Run: Key Differences Explained

Suunto Race S VS Suunto Run

If you’re torn between choosing Suunto Race S vs Suunto Run, you’re not alone. Both watches offer impressive features for runners and fitness enthusiasts, but they cater to slightly different needs and budgets.

In this post, we’ll break down their differences and similarities across key categories to help you decide which one fits your lifestyle best.

πŸ› οΈ Build and Design

Dimensions, Weight, Materials, Buttons

FeatureSuunto Race SSuunto Run
Case Size45mm46mm
Thickness11.4mm11.5mm
Weight60g (steel)36g (polymer)
Bezel MaterialStainless SteelStainless Steel
Buttons3 (incl. Digital Crown)3 (incl. Digital Crown)

Summary

The Suunto Race S is slightly more compact but heavier due to its premium steel build. It’s ideal for those who prefer a rugged, high-end feel.

The Suunto Run, on the other hand, is lighter and more comfortable for everyday wear, especially for runners who prioritize minimalism.

πŸ–₯️ Display

Size, Brightness, Protection

Suunto Race S vs Suunto Run Display
FeatureSuunto Race SSuunto Run
Display TypeAMOLEDAMOLED
Size1.32″1.32″
Resolution466 x 466466 x 466
BrightnessHigh (Always-On Option)High (Always-On Option)
ProtectionGorilla GlassGorilla Glass

Summary

Both watches feature vibrant AMOLED displays with identical size and resolution.

The Race S offers slightly better UI responsiveness and customization options, while the Run maintains excellent visibility in all lighting conditions. Display-wise, it’s a tie.


πŸƒβ€β™‚οΈ Running Features

Recovery Metrics, Training Load, Navigation

FeatureSuunto Race SSuunto Run
GPS AccuracyDual-band GNSSDual-band GNSS
Training LoadYesYes
Recovery MetricsAdvancedBasic
Climb GuidanceYesNo
Offline MapsYes (32GB storage)No (breadcrumb only)
Multisport ModesYesYes

Summary

The Race S clearly leads in running features. With Climb Guidance, offline maps, and more advanced recovery insights, it’s built for serious athletes and trail runners. The Run still offers solid tracking and multisport support but lacks some of the premium navigation tools.

🧘 Health Tracking Features

Sleep, HRV, SpO2, Skin Temp

FeatureSuunto Race SSuunto Run
Sleep TrackingYes (with stages)Yes
HRV MonitoringYesYes
SpO2 SensorYesYes
Skin TemperatureYesYes
Menstrual TrackingYesYes
Stress MonitoringYesYes

Summary

Both watches offer a robust suite of health tracking features. The Race S may have slightly more accurate sensors, but the Run delivers nearly identical wellness insights at a lower price. For general health tracking, either watch will serve you well.

πŸ”‹ Suunto Race S vs Suunto Run Battery Life

ModeSuunto Race SSuunto Run
Smartwatch ModeUp to 9 daysUp to 12 days
GPS Training ModeUp to 30 hoursUp to 20 hours
Power Save ModeUp to 312 hoursUp to 40 hours

Summary

The Suunto Run wins in smartwatch mode longevity, making it ideal for users who don’t train daily. However, the Race S excels in GPS and power-saving modes, perfect for endurance athletes and adventurers.

πŸ’° Price Differences

ModelPrice (USD)
Suunto Race S$349
Suunto Run$249

Summary

The Suunto Run is $100 cheaper, making it a compelling option for budget-conscious runners. The Race S justifies its higher price with premium materials and advanced features, but not everyone needs those extras.

🏁 Final Verdict: Who Should Buy Which?

Suunto Race S – Best For:

  • Trail runners and ultra athletes
  • Users who need advanced navigation and recovery tools
  • Those who prefer premium build quality

Suunto Run – Best For:

  • Casual runners and fitness enthusiasts
  • Budget-conscious buyers
  • Users who want music and health tracking without the frills

πŸ“ Conclusion

Both the Suunto Race S and Suunto Run are excellent GPS watches, but they serve different audiences.

If you’re chasing performance and adventure, the Race S is your go-to. If you want a lightweight, affordable companion for everyday runs and wellness tracking, the Run is a smart pick.

Direct competitors of Suunto Race S are a more expensive Garmin Forerunner 570 and a cheaper Coros Pace Pro Watch.